Understanding the Ladder of Inference in Law

After sharing the last post on the Ladder of Inference, a few people asked a great question:

“But lawyers have to jump to conclusions… don’t they?”

My wife and I are still deep (maybe too much, but that is another topic) in our Suits marathon, and the answer becomes clear every episode:

**Yes, lawyers climb the ladder —

And they do it intentionally.
We do it accidentally, unconsciously.

It’s a big difference. Let’s break it down.


In Law, Climbing the Ladder Is the Assignment

A lawyer isn’t trying to find “universal truth.”
They’re trying to build a persuasive case.

The job requires them to:

  • choose a position,
  • form a compelling narrative,
  • select supportive evidence,
  • dismiss contradictory evidence,
  • and argue with absolute confidence.

This is not a bug in the legal system.
It is the legal system.

A case is not truth — it’s a constructed story, polished until it shines.

That’s why Harvey walks into a room already knowing the conclusion he’s going to prove.

It’s also why Louis gets into trouble: he uses his legal mind on personal problems.


In Life, This Strategy Backfires Spectacularly

When you use a lawyer’s ladder in your personal world, things get messy fast.

Here’s what non-lawyers (that’s us!) do:

We pick a belief, often in a split second.

  • “She doesn’t respect me.”
  • “He’s out to get me.”
  • “They lied.”
  • “I know exactly what’s going on.”

Then we go into Harvey Specter mode:

  • select only data that fits our story,
  • ignore anything that contradicts it,
  • act as if our story is a fact,
  • escalate from a feeling to a courtroom drama in under 30 seconds.

But unlike Harvey, we don’t have closing arguments or cross-examination.

We have:

  • stress,
  • damaged relationships,
  • misunderstandings,
  • and decisions made out of insecurity rather than clarity.

The Best Lawyers Know When to Stay at the Bottom

Jessicas, the Mikes, and Gretchen-types have one superpower:

They know how to pause before climbing.

They gather facts first.
They look from a clear mind.
They question their own interpretations.

In Suits, this is why Donna and Gretchen are rarely caught in emotional storms.
They don’t build a case unless they have to.

And most of the time in life… we don’t have to. (hint)


The Insight

Lawyers build cases.
Humans build stories.

One is professional.
One is psychological, and maybe ontology.

The difference?

Lawyers know they’re climbing a ladder.

We don’t.

Seeing the ladder is how we step off it, and reclaim clarity, calm, and better choices.

Much love,

Reflective Coaching Question:

When you feel the urge to defend your position, pause and ask:
“What if this is a story I’m constructing — not what’s actually happening?”
What does that open up for you?


This video provides a concise breakdown of how a case is built: fact patterns, logic, and persuasion.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.